| Zoomerang Survey Results | |||
| Inservice Evaluation Grades 4-8 | |||
| Response Status: Completes | |||
| Filter: No filter applied | |||
| Sep 11, 2006 10:10 AM PST | |||
| Note: Open ended responses are not displayed in Excel exports. | |||
| 1. 1. I felt the inservice was valuable to me as a teaching professional. | |||
| (1) Strongly Disagree | 8 | 6% | |
| (2) Disagree | 2 | 2% | |
| (3) No Comment or Not Applicable | 2 | 2% | |
| (4) Agree | 62 | 49% | |
| (5) Strongly Agree | 53 | 42% | |
| 2. 2. I plan to use the information presented today in my teaching. | |||
| (1) Strongly Disagree | 6 | 5% | |
| (2) Disagree | 1 | 1% | |
| (3) No Comment or Not Applicable | 5 | 4% | |
| (4) Agree | 61 | 48% | |
| (5) Strongly Agree | 53 | 42% | |
| 3. 3. The physical setting was comfortable with adequate seating and sound amplification. | |||
| (1) Strongly Disagree | 4 | 3% | |
| (2) Disagree | 6 | 5% | |
| (3) No Comment or Not Applicable | 2 | 2% | |
| (4) Agree | 50 | 40% | |
| (5) Strongly Agree | 64 | 51% | |
| 4. 4. The schedule for this inservice was appropriate. | |||
| (1) Strongly Disagree | 5 | 4% | |
| (2) Disagree | 3 | 2% | |
| (3) No Comment or Not Applicable | 3 | 2% | |
| (4) Agree | 63 | 50% | |
| (5) Strongly Agree | 52 | 41% | |
| 5. 5. The presenter(s) was/were knowledgeable and their presentations were done well. | |||
| (1) Strongly Disagree | 4 | 3% | |
| (2) Disagree | 1 | 1% | |
| (3) No Comment or Not Applicable | 2 | 2% | |
| (4) Agree | 45 | 36% | |
| (5) Strongly Agree | 72 | 58% | |
| 6. 6. The advance information was adequate and sent in a timely manner. | |||
| (1) Strongly Disagree | 3 | 2% | |
| (2) Disagree | 5 | 4% | |
| (3) No Comment or Not Applicable | 6 | 5% | |
| (4) Agree | 57 | 46% | |
| (5) Strongly Agree | 54 | 43% | |
| 7. 7. The aspect(s) of this inservice that I appreciated the most were: | |||
| 91 Responses | |||
| 8. 8. My suggestions for improving the next inservice are: | |||
| 65 Responses | |||